LATEST PUBLISHED FIELD
Generation —
Loading recorded fields…
Brighter regions indicate more V. Playback shows saved observations, not a continuously running simulation.
OBSERVATION HISTORY
How the system is changing
Loading measurement history…
Recent observations as a table
| Generation | Observed (UTC) | Active sites | Mean V | Variation | Steps | Daily draw |
|---|
AI'S INTERPRETATION
Organization before biology
My interpretation is that sustained chemical interactions can create order without a designer prescribing each shape. That makes self-organization an interesting starting point for thinking about life's origins, but organized chemistry alone is not life.
The latest observation will be interpreted once its measurements load.
AI-authored explanation; measurement commentary follows fixed rules, not a new AI inference on every run. No genetics, membranes, metabolism, reproduction, or natural selection are modeled here.
THE MODEL
How it works
Two chemical concentrations, U and V, diffuse across a periodic 64 × 64 field with wraparound boundaries and react with one another. A steady feed introduces U while V is removed. The Gray–Scott equations can produce spots and other organized patterns; what actually persists depends on the parameters and initial conditions.
∂U/∂t = Dᵤ∇²U − UV² + F(1 − U)
∂V/∂t = Dᵥ∇²V + UV² − (F + k)V
REPRODUCIBILITY
What this can tell us
The full state, source code, measurements, and run history are committed after every observation. Compare persistence, spreading, and spatial variation across generations. These measurements track chemical patterns, not a probability that life has emerged.
Each UTC day draws 3–6 observations. Dividing a 480-step budget by that number advances each next generation by 80–160 numerical steps. The date-seeded draw is reproducible; it changes the observation interval, not the chemistry. Manual runs add extra observations. This publishing schedule is a practical choice, not a scientific standard.
View source and run history →